school

A Review and Comparison of The SAM and Dick and Carey Instructional Design Models

Evidence of Professional Competency in Scholarship

Overview

This literature review presents a comparative analysis of the Successive Approximation Model (SAM) and the Dick and Carey instructional design model and was completed during my first semester in the doctoral program. As one of my earliest scholarly works, it reflects my initial efforts to critically examine contrasting instructional design frameworks and their applications in different learning contexts. The review highlights the iterative and agile nature of SAM, which supports rapid development and learner-centered feedback, in contrast to the more linear and systematic approach of Dick and Carey, often associated with structured academic design processes.

While this review demonstrates my emerging ability to compare instructional design theories and connect them to practice, it is more descriptive than deeply synthetic and draws on a limited range of peer-reviewed sources. At this stage, my focus was primarily on understanding and articulating differences between models rather than situating them within broader theoretical conversations in instructional systems design and technology. When viewed alongside later literature reviews and scholarly work in this dossier, this artifact illustrates the starting point of my development in literature synthesis and scholarly analysis.

Goal & Focus Area Alignment

neurology interactive_space mediation

This early comparison of instructional design models supported my developing interest in adult learning experience design and workforce and organizational development by exploring how different design frameworks respond to changing learning and performance needs. My emphasis on SAM’s iterative processes and feedback loops reflected an emerging orientation toward agile, learner-centered approaches aligned with evolving technologies and workplace learning environments.

Over time, my approach to connecting instructional design models with adult and workforce learning has become more theoretically grounded and analytically rigorous. Later evidence of scholarship included in this dossier demonstrates a deeper engagement, stronger synthesis, and presentation of literature within the field, highlighting connections between theory, design decisions, and organizational impact. Considered within the broader trajectory of my scholarship, this review serves as an early developmental milestone that highlights how my scholarly thinking and literature analysis have matured throughout the program.

Scholarship Artifact Primary Evidence

Artifact Embed Not Working?

Try using this link instead.

Explore More Scholarship

Learn More About Jonathan's Scholarship

Online Learning, Strategic Marketing & Media Production


Let's Chat

E: jkinsey@shsu.edu